Last month, I reported that attorney Larry Hammond and others are seeking to establish an Arizona indigent defense commission. The unfilled need is dire, he said, and growing worse. He asked the State Bar to step up and create a body that will study and propose alternatives. (The Bar is considering it.)
So timely, a New York Times article this Sunday explored two states’ responses to the crushing problem. Here is how Adam Liptak opens his piece on Need-Blind Justice:
“Fifty years ago, in Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court ruled that poor people accused of serious crimes were entitled to lawyers paid for by the government. But the court did not say how the lawyers should be chosen, how much they should be paid or how to make sure they defended their clients with vigor and care.”
“This created a simple problem and a complicated one. The simple one is that many appointed lawyers are not paid enough to allow them to do their jobs. The solution to that problem is money.”
“The complicated problem is that the Gideon decision created attorney–client relationships barely worthy of the name, between lawyers with conflicting incentives and clients without choices. Now a judge in Washington State and a county in Texas are trying to address that deeper problem in ways that have never been tried in the United States.”
“Their proposed solutions reflect competing schools of legal thought. The approach in Washington State is a top-down exercise of federal power, pushing lawyers to make sure they meet with their clients, tell them their rights, investigate their cases and represent them zealously in plea negotiations and at trial.”
“The one in Comal County, Tex., is a bottom-up appeal to the marketplace. Defendants there will soon be able to use government money to choose their lawyers in much the same way that parents in some parts of the country use government vouchers to pay for grade school.”
“The county calls it ‘client choice.’ Another name: Gideon vouchers.”
Read Liptak’s whole story here.
It was Justice Louis Brandeis who mused that states could serve as laboratories for democracy, where they might try “novel social and economic experiments without risk to the rest of the country.” It seems that Washington and Texas are doing just that, all in service to a problem affecting countless residents.
Two questions arise:
- Which approach, if either, offers the greatest likelihood of success?
- Where is Arizona’s approach? Will it be one of those two, or an entirely different strategy that a new commission may devise?
In Arizona Attorney Magazine, we’d like to cover the developing conversation. So what do you think?
Follow @azatty
January 7, 2014 at 10:05 am
Tim – My workday would be much less rich if I did not have your blog posts to read.
Legal rep. for the poor…
Where did that graphic come from – Love it. Want it!
Second, what’s your batting average with getting responses and comment from blog posts on thoughtful topics?
Dan Wise dwise@nhbar.org
Communications Director & Bar News Editor
New Hampshire Bar Association
2 Pillsbury Street, Suite 300
Concord, NH 03301
603 715-3264 direct
603 224-6942 office
603 224 2910 fax
Supporting members of the legal profession & their service to the public and the justice system.
January 7, 2014 at 10:40 am
The terrific illustration is in the NY Times story. I await a call from their attorney(s).
As for reader responses: Very few folks opt to comment here in the blog. Risk-averse? Shy? Who can explain the lawyer-reader mind?
But I often receive an email responses, or direct messages via Twitter. Out of all those, I might get some story leads or, occasionally, an author who wants to write on a topic.
In this instance, I’d especially like to hear from those advocating for a state indigent representation commission. These poke-y blog posts are just part of my full-court press urging an article. (Are you listening, gang?)
And thanks, Dan! Stay warm.
Tim
January 15, 2014 at 10:09 am
I am telling you Tim we HAVE to do a Drones for Your Bar Association presentation!!
Dan Wise dwise@nhbar.org Communications Director & Bar News Editor New Hampshire Bar Association 2 Pillsbury Street, Suite 300 Concord, NH 03301 603 715-3264 direct 603 224-6942 office 603 224 2910 fax Supporting members of the legal profession & their service to the public and the justice system.
January 15, 2014 at 10:43 am
Dan,
Agreed! Meet you in L.A. for this law school conference?
http://www.swlaw.edu/academics/entertainmentlaw/instevents/droneconf2014
Tim