January 25, 2017
Justice Sonia Sotomayor greets University of Arizona Professor Rebecca Tsosie, Jan. 23, 2017, ASU Gammage Auditorium, at the annual John Frank Lecture.
This week, I had the privilege to attend the annual John Frank Lecture at ASU. This year’s esteemed speaker was Supreme Court Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who engaged in a dialogue with Hon. Mary Schroeder of the Ninth Circuit (and its former Chief Judge). I’m happy to share excellent reporting of the event (below) by attorney Ashley Kasarjian, of Snell & Wilmer. She’s also a former Chair of the Arizona Attorney Editorial Board, so she’s excellent in multiple ways!
If this blog post were a movie, the opening scene would be the end of the evening—roaring applause and a standing ovation with Justice Sotomayor shaking hands, hugging kids at the end of the aisle, and walking through the crowd at Gammage Auditorium. Now, rewind back… Last night, U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor […]
via Justice Sotomayor Visits Arizona State University — Employment and the Law: A legal blog from the perspective of an employment attorney
Keep reading here.
January 19, 2017
Posted by azatty under Arizona Attorney Magazine
, Change of Venue
, Law Practice
, Lawyer kudos
, Legal events
| Tags: Jayne Reardon
, Jeena Cho
, Karen Gifford
, National Association of Bar Executives
Leave a Comment
In the current issue of Arizona Attorney Magazine, a book review explores what attorneys can learn about themselves and their world via meditation.
If you’re unsure about that idea and cotton toward the tried and true, let’s remember that meditation has been around for millennia. So it should be acceptable, even to your firm’s management committee. Just sayin’.
The review author is attorney Juliet Peters, and you can read the entire review here.
And the book co-authors are Jeena Cho and Karen Gifford—lawyers themselves, in case lawyers are the only ones you trust with your self-improvement.
Happily, Jeena will be a panelist on a program I’m co-producing in just a few weeks. Unhappily, the program will be in Miami, not Phoenix. But if you happen to be at the midyear meeting of the National Association of Bar Executives, drop in! Or if you’re in the environs that week for the ABA meeting, drop me a line at firstname.lastname@example.org, or tweet to me @azatty. It’d be great to meet and compare mindfulness strategies! (Spoiler alert: You’ve got me beat, and I don’t even know you.)
Here is a link to the conference. And here is a description of the panel, titled “Mindful Lawyer, Mindful Bar,” which also features Jayne Reardon, Executive Director of the Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism:
“Mindfulness has become top-of-mind for many people, including your members. Even as work–life balance, meditation, and increased fulfillment and satisfaction have become a more central part of a professional’s goals, those aspirations may seem harder than ever to achieve. Our panelists have learned through law and life experience how challenging incorporating practices such as self-care and mindfulness can be—but they have discovered the many wonderful benefits of these practices, including more joy and satisfaction. They will talk about the importance of mindfulness for the attorney. They also will offer practical tips and next steps to create robust mindfulness programs at your bar.”
See you in Miami … or wherever thoughtful lawyers gather.
January 18, 2017
Posted by azatty under Change of Venue
, Law Practice
, Legal events
, Social Media
| Tags: Bob Denney
, law practice
, social media
Leave a Comment
On a regular basis, Bob Denney puts himself and his judgment out there and predicts what will be the coming year’s hot—and cold—law practice areas.
He recently did so again, and I encourage you to read his prognostications.
In the meantime, here are a few he mentioned that made me pause and wonder how lawyers and law firms are responding to these new pushes and pulls. As Bob says:
Social media. Continues to be far more effective for building individual lawyer reputations than for firms.
Competition. It’s no longer just from other law firms. It’s now coming from two other directions: Non-legal business entities like LegalZoom and, for large firms, more and more from the clients themselves who are using their legal departments as well as alternate service providers.
Cybersecurity. While many firms have developed plans for reacting to a cyberattack, many more have still not developed or implemented cybersecurity plans to prevent such attacks. One overlooked factor is what actually constitutes a breach. Some firms regard any unsanctioned access of a firm system as a breach, while others do not regard it as a breach until something — data, files or money — has been taken.
Scamblogging. A category of online writing by debt-burdened law school graduates who are convinced their law schools misled them about their opportunities for employment.
What’s growing in your law practice? If it’s a niche or topic that surprises you, please write to me at email@example.com.
January 17, 2017
Posted by azatty under Change of Venue
, Law Practice
, Lawyer kudos
, Pro Bono
, Social Media
| Tags: access to justice
, Arizona Foundation for Legal Services & Education
, Arizona Supreme Court
, Gary Krcmarik
, online legal assistance
Here is some important news from the Arizona Supreme Court. This information may be helpful to you, but it may be even more vital to friends, neighbors, and family members.
PHOENIX – A new website launched on January 12 to offer basic assistance to people of all walks of life who have legal questions or need assistance in resolving disputes in court. AzCourtHelp.org is organized by topic and geographical location to help people find the court locations, forms, and other information they may need.
Geographical information includes court locations, maps, hours, payment terms, parking, and accessibility information. The site also features live chat forums to assist with legal information, legal talk clinics on popular topics, and other information helpful to self-represented individuals. Frequently asked questions are arranged by topic so users can quickly find the information that is most helpful to their situation. The site will also include video tutorials, webinars, and a calendar of free legal workshops around Arizona.
AZCourtHelp.org has a presence on Facebook as a way to expand its reach.
The backbone of the website’s video and interactive component is the Coconino County Superior Court’s Virtual Resource Center, which will be hosting the video outreach for statewide viewing.
Gary Krcmarik, Coconino County Superior Court Administrator
“The Chief Justice challenged us to work together to improve access to justice,” said Coconino County Superior Court Administrator Gary Krcmarik. “We took up that challenge by developing this website in conjunction with our Virtual Resource Center to provide this valuable information statewide. We are grateful to the Arizona Foundation for Legal Services and Education, which graciously partnered with us to design the website and curate the information on it.”
Krcmarik said that today’s public launch is a beginning of a larger effort and more information, including Spanish-language content, will be added to the site on a daily and weekly basis.
Like AzCourtHelp.org on Facebook.
January 11, 2017
An Instagram employee takes a video using Instagram’s new video function at Facebook’s corporate headquarters during a media event in Menlo Park, Calif. (Josh Edelson/AFP via Getty Images)
If you had to guess what documents are most central to your daily life and to your future possibilities, I’d wager many Americans would point to works like the Constitution or the Declaration of Independence. Probably because they think that’s how they should answer.
I am the biggest fan of those documents, but that answer might not be entirely correct. Instead, I’d point you to those below-the-radar Terms of Service that populate the legal life of every app you use. And that means they populate your life too, like it or not.
I’ve written about terms of service before, and I find these tiny little, unassuming adhesion contracts to be fascinating. I wrote here about a change to the Snapchat ToS.
And for good measure, let me re-share a Venn diagram that explains the intersection of law and love. (Spoiler alert: It’s complicated.)
Very scientific Venn diagram catalogs the human condition.
This past week I read a terrific article (by the similarly terrific Amy Wang) about efforts to make terms of service more understandable, especially to youngsters. (Hat-tip to Wayne Rainey for the lead on the article.)
The Washington Post story was driven by the January 4 release of a report called “Growing Up Digital,” which examined young people’s interactions with those ever-present tech marvels that transform—and complicate—our lives.
And where good things happen, I’m never surprised to see a lawyer in the mix. The story tells how one of the task force members was charged with trying to redraft the Instagram terms of service to make them understandable to teens and other humans.
So that’s what London-based privacy lawyer Jenny Afia did.
Here’s a bit from the story:
Lawyer Jenny Afia rewrote the Instagram terms of service so kids would know their privacy rights.
“Afia was a member of a ‘Growing Up Digital’ task force group convened by the Children’s Commissioner for England to study Internet use among teens and the concerns children might face as they grow up in the digital age. The group found more than a third of Internet users are younger than 18, with 12- to 15-year-olds spending more than 20 hours a week online. Most of those children have no idea what their privacy rights are, despite all of them agreeing to terms and conditions before starting their social media accounts, Afia said. The task force, which included experts from the public and private sector, worked for a year and released its report Wednesday [Jan. 4].”
If you’ve ever read terms of service (and I hope you do), the next statement won’t surprise you: “The group ran Instagram’s terms and conditions through a readability study and found that it registered at a postgraduate reading level, Afia said.”
Fascinating and important stuff. Though Instagram wouldn’t comment for the story (probably upon advice of the same lawyers who drafted their ToS), here’s hoping efforts like this make a dent in the way these important, meaning-laden documents are drafted.
Once again, here’s a link to the complete Post story.
And you can read the complete “Growing Up Digital” report here.
January 6, 2017
Big Data may mean Big Insights.
At least, that’s one major takeaway I got from the Legal Trends Report released by Clio late last year.
Yesterday, I shared my December editor’s column from Arizona Attorney Magazine in which I discussed the report and a few of its findings. But I also had promised to write about the part of the report that wasn’t so much about law practice, but about the power of data to make positive change.
Today, let me get back to that.
Here is the pertinent part of my column I’ll extrapolate on today:
Before I dive in, here again is a link to the complete report. Read it yourself and let me know what you think.
Data + lawyering? Yes, please, say Clio.
Besides the bullet points I mentioned in my column, here are a few more macro-level insights by Clio:
- The total 2015 realization rate (actual hours billed as a proportion of actual billable hours worked) came in at 81 percent, but this differed noticeably by practice area and by state.
- The total 2015 collection rate (actual revenue proportional to hours billed) was 86 percent.
So let’s jump in, shall we, and start with Clio’s premise, regarding the dearth of practice decisions driven by data.
Essentially, they’re saying, in the 4,000-year history of the legal profession, lawyers, firm owners, and decision makers have suffered from a scarcity of industry data. Law firms have had only sparse resources to find the business insights required to run a viable practice.
I know, dramatic, right? In the very first line of their executive summary, they’ve got me with a compelling narrative. Plus, they have subtly conjoined me with every great lawyer, from Hammurabi, to Abe Lincoln, to Sandra Day O’Connor. Those folks—and me. We’ve all suffered the same law practice pains that arise from insufficient reliable evidence. But we’ll solve it together.
OK, I joke, but there’s something to their point. The mass of data that we rely on do come from (as Clio says) self-reported data and often small sample sizes. And is there a way to know if the data we rely on REALLY came from firms of a size like our own firm? Unlikely.
Hammurabi had a great Code, the best, really. But who knows what he could have achieved with better data?!
But the advent of Big Data and data aggregators has changed all that. Now companies like Clio—and others you interact with every day—have access to your actual choices and interactions with their products. They can see, moment by moment, how many new matters are opened, and how many invoices are generated, and how many remain unpaid.
Here is where I must note that Clio (like all reputable companies) is using all of our online decision-making anonymously, stripped of identifying data. But when they take this massive batch of anonymous data, and analyze it, a remarkable picture of us as a profession emerges. The world is changed—for the better.
So that was a bit of a wake-up call.
But I leave you today again, once again, with their visceral image of your practice as a funnel.
Any of us who practice or have practiced law understand that there is a flow to the work, and that we need matters to begin, end, and get paid for—and hopefully all those things overlap in multiple matters so there is actual cash flow. But picturing it like a funnel invites a disturbingly accurate assessment of where we all stand.
Because we are all busy, I invite you to turn to the report’s page 35. Or, if you’re really busy, I’ll type it for you:
Funnel Cloud? The Devastating Conclusion
Out of an eight-hour workday, the average firm collects payment on only 1.4 hours of billable time. These unit economics would be devastating to almost any industry, and they help explain why, despite charging an average $232 per billable hour, the average small-to-mid-sized firm struggles to make ends meet.
I hope you weren’t standing up when you read that.
Once again, here is a link to the complete report.
January 5, 2017
Data + lawyering? Yes, say Clio.
Was it way back in December that I wrote about the new Clio law practice report? And promised you more?
Sorry about that.
Yes, it was in the December issue of Arizona Attorney Magazine that I chatted about the Clio Legal Trends Report. You can read the column here.
Because I’m super-helpful, I’ve pasted in below what I wrote, so you don’t even have to click.
And tomorrow, I’ll offer some more thoughts on what we can learn from the Clio report—and reports like it. Here’s my column (plus an image):
We thought we understood the way the world worked—and then the Cubs won the World Series.
I suppose it’s good we’re still capable of being surprised. It probably says something nice about our capacity for joy. Or something.
Of course, surprises are not always happy, which occurred to me as I read a new report on law practice trends.
Via their “Legal Trends Report,” the people at Clio—the cloud-based practice management people—want you to know two things about your law practice.
First, your practice is a funnel—one that may be malfunctioning.
And second, consider using data—actual facts based in reality—to drive your practice decisions.
Clio will likely say I’m oversimplifying a vast array of takeaways from the report released in late October. But those takeaways—and the underlying facts—are pretty stunning.
Here is a link to the complete report. Read it yourself and let me know what you think.
And here are two insights compiled by Clio:
- The average rate billed by lawyers across the United States is $232 per hour.
- The total utilization rate (billable hours as a proportion of hours available in a working day) for lawyers in 2015 was just 28 percent. For solo lawyers, that number drops to just 22 percent.
What makes this noteworthy?
They can see, moment by moment, how many new matters are opened, how many invoices are generated, how many remain unpaid.
Does this spell the end of surveys based on self-reported data? We’ll see.
The second takeaway is related to the unprofitability of many attorneys’ law practices. When we look at just two of Clio’s many charts—Arizona’s average hourly rate, and its (gulp) average collection rate, the situation appears dire.
There’s definitely more to the picture. But as we head into 2017, we will seek ways to tell the true story of law practice challenges.
Until then: Go Cubs.
Next Page »