Are drones the future? Or annoyances that should be grounded?

Are drones the future? Or annoyances that should be grounded?

“All politics is local,” famously remarked once-Speaker of the U.S. House Tip O’Neill. And that is certainly true in the increasingly rancorous debate over the use of drones. A subject that we might believe is all-FCC increasingly becomes a local battle.

An Arizona Republic story this week describes the growing resistance to unmanned aircraft systems, or UAS. As the story explains, the anti-drone gauntlet has been picked up vehemently in Paradise Valley, and more gingerly in Phoenix.

As I have mentioned before, I continue to be intrigued by the little whirly-gigs and the legal questions that swarm around them. (And we covered some of those topics in Arizona Attorney Magazine.)

Looking toward the horizon (which would be easier from a drone), I think that UAS are bound to become an even more central part of everyday life. Despite the best efforts of municipalities, drones’ multiple possible uses and relative low cost nearly guarantee their increased use. Is there anyone who wagers the FAA will ignore that economic impact when it develops new rules of engagement? I didn’t think so.

I’m developing a short list of lawyers who are adept in the legal world of drones. I look forward to connecting with them on coverage of what’s next, and how the regulation of drones may ascend—or settle back down to earth.